Saturday, November 23, 2019
3 More Sentences Lacking One Word to Be Correct
3 More Sentences Lacking One Word to Be Correct 3 More Sentences Lacking One Word to Be Correct 3 More Sentences Lacking One Word to Be Correct By Mark Nichol Often, when readers stumble on a faultily constructed sentence, the obstacle is merely one seemingly inconsequential word- or, more accurately, the omission of what is actually an essential component of the sentence. In each example below, one missing word throws off the sentence. Discussion and a revision point the way to a coherent statement. 1. Managementââ¬â¢s assumptions about markets, customers, competition, technology, regulatory and other external factors are fundamentals that shape the organizationââ¬â¢s strategy. This sentence is constructed as if regulatory and ââ¬Å"other external factorsâ⬠are distinct list items, but they are actually part of the same unit- regulatory and ââ¬Å"other externalâ⬠each modifies factors, so the sentence must be slightly reorganized to reflect that fact: ââ¬Å"Managementââ¬â¢s assumptions about markets, customers, competition, technology, and regulatory and other external factors are fundamentals that shape the organizationââ¬â¢s strategy.â⬠2. What has worked in the past can and will change by the season, day, or even the hour. The article the before season can carry the weight of all three nouns that follow it (ââ¬Å"What has worked in the past can and will change by the season, day, or even hourâ⬠), but the sentence flows better if each noun is assigned its own article: ââ¬Å"What has worked in the past can and will change by the season, the day, or even the hour.â⬠Revising the sentence to reflect one alternative or the other is necessary, because if all three nouns do not share one article, day must, like the others, have its own. 3. The above list is not intended to be all-inclusive or suggest that companies not take advantage of resources. The sentence syntax dictates that what precedes or and what follows it be equivalent, so each phrase should be preceded by the infinitive to; otherwise, the implication is that the reader is to understand that the equivalents are ââ¬Å"be all-inclusiveâ⬠and ââ¬Å"be suggestâ⬠: ââ¬Å"The above list is not intended to be all-inclusive or to suggest that companies not take advantage of resources.â⬠Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Style category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Definitely use "the" or "a"Taser or Tazer? Tazing or Tasering?Words Often Misspelled Because of Double Letters
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.